Announcement

Collapse

Facebook Forum Migration

Our forums have migrated to Facebook. If you are already an iMSN forum member you will be grandfathered in.

To access the Call Room and Marriage Matters, head to: https://m.facebook.com/groups/400932...eferrer=search

You can find the health and fitness forums here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/133538...eferrer=search

Private parenting discussions are here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/382903...eferrer=search

We look forward to seeing you on Facebook!
See more
See less

whole language vs phonics

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by j3qpatel

    Oh yeah? Then I'll add the bit about the parent who said "I get how to teach addition, you add 2 + 2 (holding up 2 fingers on each hand) and that equals 4. But how do you teach subtraction?" After waiting for the teacher to stifle a laugh and give an answer, I turned around and said "Jellybeans".

    I guess I shouldn't be hoping to make some new friends here. I'm really a b****!
    You are my new hero!


    I agree with kevin, btw about the spelling. My older children have atrocious spelling and I've often had to say "geeesh, sound it out" for a word that was spelled phonetically.
    ~Mom of 5, married to an ID doc
    ~A Rolling Stone Gathers No Moss

    Comment


    • #17
      Since I'm inherently lazy and don't want to take the effort to support my views , I vote for a mixture of the "fonics" and the "hole" language approach, focusing more on the phonics end of the continuum.

      One without the other doesn't make sense to me. You have to understand phonics to read new words and yet some words you just have to know cold.

      But in the spirit of good will, I could be wrong about all of this.

      Kelly
      In my dreams I run with the Kenyans.

      Comment

      Working...
      X