I know this a bit untimely, but I just recently read the People magazine article which recounted Dylan Farrow's open letter to the NYT wherein she accused her father Woody Allen of molesting her as a little girl. Apparently there was a thorough investigation of these charges when she was a child but ultimately the prosecutor determined there wasn't enough evidence to go forward with the case. (These type of cases take an extraordinary amount of evidence to convict). Anyhoo, while I don't believe in vigilante justice or trial in the popular media, I find it pretty damning that Allen went on to *marry* his step daughter. Reports stated that they started "dating" when she was 21. Gag. To put it very mildly, Allen clearly has ...uh...morally flexible boundaries on what constitutes an appropriate relationship.
Allen isn't the first celebrity with allegations of sexual impropriety with minors: Michael Jackson, R. Kelly, Roman Polanski. Yet all of these individuals went on to gain both commercial and popular success. While I don't think society should try these individuals in the press, I'm sort of surprised that they have all been able to eventually go back to business as normal. There isn't even a call for a boycott, etc. Compare this public nonresponse to a redneck reality star who WHEN ASKED, shared his backwoods opinions on homosexuality and a firestorm of controversy ensued. People posted endless ragey-rage rants about it on Facebook and then drove to eat some homophobic chicken that night at their local Chic-Fil-A.
I guess I'm just having a hard time with the manufactured rage versus some of the issues that might merit a more censorious response.
I'm curious to your take on all of this. If this convo becomes heated, I'm happy to have it moved to debates.
Allen isn't the first celebrity with allegations of sexual impropriety with minors: Michael Jackson, R. Kelly, Roman Polanski. Yet all of these individuals went on to gain both commercial and popular success. While I don't think society should try these individuals in the press, I'm sort of surprised that they have all been able to eventually go back to business as normal. There isn't even a call for a boycott, etc. Compare this public nonresponse to a redneck reality star who WHEN ASKED, shared his backwoods opinions on homosexuality and a firestorm of controversy ensued. People posted endless ragey-rage rants about it on Facebook and then drove to eat some homophobic chicken that night at their local Chic-Fil-A.
I guess I'm just having a hard time with the manufactured rage versus some of the issues that might merit a more censorious response.
I'm curious to your take on all of this. If this convo becomes heated, I'm happy to have it moved to debates.
Comment