Alison's thread got me over thinking.
. After my post I started wondering if I'm still (unknowingly) teaching my children manipulative behavior by rewarding them for good behavior. Where do you draw the line? Can you start with external rewards and move to intrinsic rewards, or should you start with where you are going? DH and I were both raised similarly with negative consequences and positive rewards. We've continued that method on autopilot more or less. Alison's thread lead to an interesting, long discussion about this and how we want to continue from here. DH thinks that rewards for good behavior is the way the world turns, ie: work etc. I argued that work was an open exchange of services/goods, not necessarily a means of controlling behavior although there is some overlap. Most parents will reward good behavior or grades or whatever. My parents did. It was appreciated and I enjoyed the special recognition and still matured into an intrinsically motivated woman. Undoubtedly, I would I continued the same without the rewards, but again, I enjoyed them and felt recognized. But I don't want my children to learn that you control another person's behavior by either witholding or giving something they desire. And then there is ideals and reality, occasionally they overlap.
I think I still need to tease out the difference between rewards and control. Who knew that wielding lollipops would be so complicated?


Comment