Pregnancy is a time when other people open up and share their parenting/life philosophies and experiences. I have heard such wildly divergent advice and varying opinions on the issue of birth order and number of children that there doesn't seem to be a real consensus as to which child was the most difficult to adjust to or integrate into the family. In the past months, I have heard all of the following:
-It is the first child that is the most difficult adjustment and represents the most abrupt change in lifestyle. The second one is a breeze because you know what your doing and you're already living a scaled back, child focused lifestyle.
vs.
-The first child is a breeze. Certainly, there are changes but you can still integrate one into your life fairly easily. Two requires a serious adaptation of lifestyle.
vs.
-The second child more than doubles your work. With two children you are always a parent. There is no break from parenting like there is when you have only one.
vs.
-Two is easier than one because they play together and you aren't as freaked out by each developmental stage.
vs.
-Number three is the miracle baby. We were already parenting. Number three is the child with which we finally relaxed and learned to enjoy each of our children as individuals. Our third child taught us to let go and enjoy the process.
vs.
-The third child is the one that puts you over the edge. At this point, the adults are outnumbered and the kids sense that vulnerability. They gang up on you, and in turn, someone always gets lost in the shuffle. There are never enough hours in the day.
My question to you BTDT parents.....which of the above best describes your feelings on the topic. Sure, they are all correct, but which one taps into your deeply held beliefs about parenting?
Kelly
-It is the first child that is the most difficult adjustment and represents the most abrupt change in lifestyle. The second one is a breeze because you know what your doing and you're already living a scaled back, child focused lifestyle.
vs.
-The first child is a breeze. Certainly, there are changes but you can still integrate one into your life fairly easily. Two requires a serious adaptation of lifestyle.
vs.
-The second child more than doubles your work. With two children you are always a parent. There is no break from parenting like there is when you have only one.
vs.
-Two is easier than one because they play together and you aren't as freaked out by each developmental stage.
vs.
-Number three is the miracle baby. We were already parenting. Number three is the child with which we finally relaxed and learned to enjoy each of our children as individuals. Our third child taught us to let go and enjoy the process.
vs.
-The third child is the one that puts you over the edge. At this point, the adults are outnumbered and the kids sense that vulnerability. They gang up on you, and in turn, someone always gets lost in the shuffle. There are never enough hours in the day.
My question to you BTDT parents.....which of the above best describes your feelings on the topic. Sure, they are all correct, but which one taps into your deeply held beliefs about parenting?
Kelly
Comment