Announcement

Collapse

Facebook Forum Migration

Our forums have migrated to Facebook. If you are already an iMSN forum member you will be grandfathered in.

To access the Call Room and Marriage Matters, head to: https://m.facebook.com/groups/400932...eferrer=search

You can find the health and fitness forums here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/133538...eferrer=search

Private parenting discussions are here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/382903...eferrer=search

We look forward to seeing you on Facebook!
See more
See less

mmmm...ABC gum

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mmmm...ABC gum

    WASHINGTON - It was a novel class exercise: Ask a room full of Montgomery County high school students to take turns chewing the same piece of gum.

    To demonstrate how sexually transmitted diseases are spread, a visiting speaker invited students to share gum in health classes at four county high schools in December and last month. School officials said a total of about 100 students participated in the lessons, although some declined to chew the gum.

    Education and health officials say the gum exercise was unsanitary and should not have happened. The speaker and the clinic, a pregnancy counseling center with a religious orientation, are no longer welcome in Montgomery schools, school officials said.

    "It was fine for me, because my best friend and me did it first," said Julia Bellefleur, 15, a Damascus High School sophomore who participated in the exercise. "But it was kind of gross for everyone else. I was just glad I did it first."

    At Damascus, about 15 students shared a stick of gum, students said.

    Julia said the speaker also asked for volunteers to sample squares of chocolate, one of which, they were told, was actually a laxative. The point was to illustrate the uncertainty of knowing whether one has contracted an STD after a sexual encounter. Four boys volunteered, she said.

    School officials said no actual laxatives were dispensed.

    Complaint sparks review
    Administrators and school board members learned of the demonstration early last month, after a parent complained to the principal of Poolesville High School, and swiftly revoked the group's permission to speak in schools. One or more speakers from Rockville Pregnancy Center had visited Damascus, Albert Einstein and Winston Churchill high schools and possibly others. Clinic speakers had been approved to visit schools since 1998; students said the speaker told them she had taught the same lessons many times.

    School officials said no complaints had previously reached a principal or school board members.

    "This basically is an unacceptable and unsanitary practice. It should never occur," said Judith Covich, director of school health services at the county health department. "The risk is about the same as sharing a glass, sharing the same straw." The practice carried a low risk of spreading the cold or flu, she said.

    Officials of the Rockville nonprofit group could not be reached yesterday for comment. On its Web site, http://www.rcpc.org/index.html, Rockville Pregnancy Center describes itself as a nonprofit, licensed medical clinic and pregnancy counseling organization. One part of the site quotes extensively from the Bible and offers a test "to see if you're going to Heaven."

    School officials sent letters last month to all students exposed to the lesson and encouraged parents to call the health department with any concerns.

    Sylvia Bellefleur, mother of Julia, said her main reaction upon reading the letter was disbelief that her daughter and her classmates went along.

    "I was surprised that she would do it," the elder Bellefleur said. "Nobody could pay me enough to do it."

    'Gum game' deemed 'repulsive'
    In a Jan. 12 memo to school board members, Deputy Superintendent Frieda K. Lacey said she would order "an immediate review of all outside speakers" for lessons on human sexuality and disease prevention, two of the most contentious topics taught in the county schools. She termed the gum exercise "repulsive" and said the employees who approved the group to speak in schools this academic year are "no longer employed" by the school system. "Every effort will be taken to prevent this from happening again," Lacey wrote.

    Students said the speaker put them at ease about the "gum game," as it is now known among school administrators: It seemed relevant enough to the lessons, and the presenter said many students had done it. Classroom teachers were present during most or all of the lessons. Brian Edwards, schools spokesman, said he could not say whether those teachers were disciplined; such procedures are confidential.

    "At first, they just asked for a volunteer to chew a piece of gum for five seconds," said Tim Perez, 15, a Damascus sophomore. "They asked, 'Is anyone willing to come up here and chew this piece of gum that has just been chewed on for five seconds?' At first, people were really hesitant to do it, and then more people started to do it. . . . I think she said the record was 18."

    Tim said he volunteered, along with three male classmates, to try the chocolates that might or might not have been laxatives. He did not chew the gum.

    "I just thought it wasn't very, like, clean," he said.
    ~shacked up with an ob/gyn~

  • #2
    All I can say is WOW . I can't even imagine a school letting anyone do this. This is disgusting to begin with, but throw in the fact that illness is making schools all over my area close down already. This would not fly in my school.

    Comment


    • #3
      I actually think it's a pretty good lesson. It drives home the message about transmission. I wouldn't be freaked out if this happened at my kid's school - but I can understand others feeling that way.

      After my daughter told me that she and the other children *licked tongues* in greeting at recess when pretending they were dinosaurs, I realized that spit is going to transfer from kid to kid - no matter how much Purell you put in a room.
      Angie
      Gyn-Onc fellowship survivor - 10 years out of the training years; reluctant suburbanite
      Mom to DS (18) and DD (15) (and many many pets)

      "Where are we going - and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

      Comment


      • #4
        Isn't there some standard demonstration where the kids all get a cup of water, but the cups have lids or something so the kids can't see the water, and one cup has food coloring in the water, and the kids all have to pour/exchange a little bit of their water with five (or something) other kids, and at the end everyone opens their cups and they all get to be shocked at how many people's cups now have colored water?

        I never did that one, but I read about it somewhere--it sounded like a much better demonstration than the gum (blech!).
        Married to a hematopathologist seven years out of training.
        Raising three girls, 11, 9, and 2.

        “That was the thing about the world: it wasn't that things were harder than you thought they were going to be, it was that they were hard in ways that you didn't expect.”
        Lev Grossman, The Magician King

        Comment


        • #5
          That is gross but is it that bad?

          But what is the analogy for putting a condom on the gum? :>

          Comment


          • #6
            I didn't get to the condom part..... Is that in there? Or are you just being creative, Nellie? :>

            I think the "Eewww, Yuck! Gross!" factor is valuable. It's better than eewing when you've got an STD or genital warts down the road. That's definitely gross, too. I suppose the colored water demonstrates the transmission well - but it doesn't gross you out. I like that it grosses them out. I think that's valuable and relatively low risk. I do the glo-germ thing here with the black lights in the elementary school. It's neat, but not dramatic. I don't see the kids saying "WOW!! I'm washing my hands 6 times today!!" They just get the idea that germs spread pretty easily.

            Maybe I'm just reeling from my PTO meeting this morning. The subject was teen alcohol use in our district. I heard the seventh graders have been busted with acid, and there was a date rape this year reported in the 10th grade. I'm all for swapping spit if it slows them down.
            Angie
            Gyn-Onc fellowship survivor - 10 years out of the training years; reluctant suburbanite
            Mom to DS (18) and DD (15) (and many many pets)

            "Where are we going - and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

            Comment


            • #7
              Just being creative!

              I agree about the benefit of the gross factor. So what if they get a cold?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by cupcake
                Just being creative!

                I agree about the benefit of the gross factor. So what if they get a cold?
                I agree w/Nellie & Angie. Plus - didn't we all do this on the bus when we were kids anyway? Sure, it's gross - but nothing is slowing them down. The amount of spit exchanged in hallway makeout sessions WAY back when I was in school was worse than some passed around gum.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Aww, come on. You are no fun, Annie.

                  They do require immunizations for most of those to enter the school building these days as it is. (All except for common cold, influenza and strep - and TB. Do they immunize for TB? They just test, right?)

                  But....as I said in my first post....I would respect your opinion on this. I'm not sure I'd personally support a ban on the program if it came to a school board vote/public health that actually asked for parent's opinions. I think the gross out factor trumps it for me. But then again, my husband treats the STDs and the HPV cancers. If he was an ID, I might have another opinion.
                  Angie
                  Gyn-Onc fellowship survivor - 10 years out of the training years; reluctant suburbanite
                  Mom to DS (18) and DD (15) (and many many pets)

                  "Where are we going - and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Ladybug


                    Bacterial Meningitis
                    Chickenpox
                    Common cold
                    Influenza
                    Mumps
                    Strep throat
                    Tuberculosis
                    Measles
                    Rubella
                    Whooping cough

                    I'd have the public health department so far up their ass they wouldn't even know what happened. It's a risk, however small, that they have *no right* to impose on students.
                    I thought that most of those were required vaccinations for public school students (mumps, tb, measles, rubella, and whooping cough)?

                    Now, I have to agere about the bacterial meningitis, flu and strep throat potential for transmission there.... EW! And, to be honest if I were one of the parents I would also be livid.

                    HOWEVER, I agree with Angie and Nellie that it was probably a WAAAAAAY effective way to explain STD's (although I think there might be other, equally gross, but less questionable ways to teach this particular lesson). Quite frankly, I hope they have huge blown up posters they display for the kids showing herpes infections, etc. Now, THAT is a disgusting deterrent - to have an image in your head going along with the STD "name". Just using the words doesn't cause the panic it should. They need to show active infections of the various STD's - in all their painful grossness....
                    Who uses a machete to cut through red tape
                    With fingernails that shine like justice
                    And a voice that is dark like tinted glass

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I think it's stupid but probably not lethal.

                      and seriously, the risks of any of the above listed diseases probably aren't any higher than the aforementioned make-out sessions, sporting equipment sharing (have any of you ever SEEN what happens at winter sport practices? wrestling mats are cesspools), toilet seats or lipgloss sharing.

                      It's just way more in your face. Which is probably the point.

                      Jenn

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by DCJenn
                        I think it's stupid but probably not lethal.

                        and seriously, the risks of any of the above listed diseases probably aren't any higher than the aforementioned make-out sessions, sporting equipment sharing (have any of you ever SEEN what happens at winter sport practices? wrestling mats are cesspools), toilet seats or lipgloss sharing.
                        Hell - just the band room! Kids share instruments, empty spit valves anywhere and everywhere EXCEPT a sink ...

                        I understand Annie's point about the health risks ... but I still don't think it's a huge issue.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          wrestling mats are cesspools
                          just look at the recent outbreak of herpes in WI?or was MN amongst HS wrestlers.

                          It's just a really stupid idea, I mean hey let's teach kids about the transmission of STD by using an exercise that can transmit disease!!?? The cups of H2O and food cloring is obviously a much better way to illustrate this idea.

                          What if someone had a fever blister, or trench mouth...eww gross!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Ladybug
                            It's seems ridiculous to me to say..."exchanging bodily fluids is gross and dangerous...here do it...the risk of contracting something is very low...so low you shouldn't really worry about it." Yeah, that will scare them. WTF? Was the instructor smoking crack?
                            Oh Crap! I hadn't thought about it that way! It's basically making the risks seem slight psychologically (like just sharing a piece of gum). Now that you put it that way....
                            Who uses a machete to cut through red tape
                            With fingernails that shine like justice
                            And a voice that is dark like tinted glass

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I think kids are well schooled in the idea that you catch colds, flu and stomach viruses from sharing spit and common germs. That's driven into them from early childhood with the "Cough in your sleeve, not your hand" and "Wash your hands!" stuff. That's why passing around gum in a room full of teenagers (or adults) grosses them out. They are also at a point where they don't think a cold is a big deal. They've probably all gottem the lecture that "We all get colds, but you can't miss school for every cold!" or such. You don't want it, but it won't kill you.

                              NOW, STDs are a different matter. I don't think they see that as exchanging fluids. That's not what leaps to mind when kids are thinking about kissing, sex or almost-sex activities. It's important (in my mind) because it connects all the years of germ evasion training for spit to sexual behavior. If you wouldn't take the gum out of this guys mouth and chew it, why on earth would you let him stick a different fluid-bearing bit inside of you? You won't risk a cold, but you will risk syphilis? That's the point I see coming across.

                              Of course, it is almost expected that the kids will refuse to pass the gum around. Also that the kids won't take the chocolate when they know that one could give them the runs. If the kids all do it anyway, the exercise loses its power. And the kids are far, far gone. They don't get the risks of communicable disease AT ALL then, not colds, not STDs, not anything.
                              Angie
                              Gyn-Onc fellowship survivor - 10 years out of the training years; reluctant suburbanite
                              Mom to DS (18) and DD (15) (and many many pets)

                              "Where are we going - and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X