Announcement

Collapse

Facebook Forum Migration

Our forums have migrated to Facebook. If you are already an iMSN forum member you will be grandfathered in.

To access the Call Room and Marriage Matters, head to: https://m.facebook.com/groups/400932...eferrer=search

You can find the health and fitness forums here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/133538...eferrer=search

Private parenting discussions are here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/382903...eferrer=search

We look forward to seeing you on Facebook!
See more
See less

surgeon sued--shocking, i know

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • surgeon sued--shocking, i know

    Southern Vermont

    Brattleboro doctor liable in $1.1M judgment

    February 15, 2007

    The Associated Press

    BRATTLEBORO — A federal court jury ordered a surgeon to pay $1.1 million to a Massachusetts man who lost part of his leg after a burn on his toe became infected.

    The jury ruled on Monday after a five-day trial that Dr. John Bookwalter was negligent in the 2001 treatment of Charles Olanyk, 56, of Whatley, Mass.

    Court documents said that Olanyk, who suffered from a variety of ailments including high blood pressure, obesity and diabetes, stubbed his toe in June 2001, and treated himself with a heating pad.

    When the pain continued, Olanyk first went to an orthopedist who referred him to Bookwalter, court documents said.

    The lawsuit alleged that Bookwalter treated the burn with topical cream and antibiotics.

    "Our allegation was that he should have been sent to a burn doctor," said Olanyk's attorney Tom Lesser of Northampton, Mass.

    "Instead, a conservative treatment was followed."

    Olanyk allegedly saw Bookwalter several times before collapsing at his home in July 2001. He was eventually taken to Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass., where his left leg was amputated below the knee.

    Bookwalter, who works at Brattleboro Memorial Hospital, said his insurance would cover up to $1 million of the judgment.

    "I thought it was crazy to be sued for a self-inflicted injury," Bookwalter told the Brattleboro Reformer.

    Bookwalter said the case showed the difficulty of taking care of overweight patients.

    In 2001, Olanyk weighed 460 pounds. He lost 150 pounds after surgery, Bookwalter said.

    "In the end, everybody's health care costs go up because this guy couldn't take care of himself," said Bookwalter.
    ~shacked up with an ob/gyn~

  • #2
    Yes, these types of awards essentially become a tax upon everyone.

    Sad.

    Kelly
    In my dreams I run with the Kenyans.

    Comment


    • #3
      THIS is exactly why I would never vote for John Edwards. I know, I know - this was not his case, blah blah blah but have you read the recent articles on this monster mansion he built in NC? People are defending him for it saying "he came from nothing and has worked really hard to get where he is" - yep, you know who he has worked really hard at the detriment of - DOCTORS!

      Never, ever, in a million years, will I vote for a ticket he is on - I don't care who the candidate with him is.

      The bad doctors should be penalized, the idiot patients should not be rewarded.
      Wife to NSG out of training, mom to 2, 10 & 8, and a beagle with wings.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Suzy Sunshine
        THIS is exactly why I would never vote for John Edwards. I know, I know - this was not his case, blah blah blah but have you read the recent articles on this monster mansion he built in NC? People are defending him for it saying "he came from nothing and has worked really hard to get where he is" - yep, you know who he has worked really hard at the detriment of - DOCTORS!

        Never, ever, in a million years, will I vote for a ticket he is on - I don't care who the candidate with him is.

        The bad doctors should be penalized, the idiot patients should not be rewarded.
        ITA with all of this.

        Comment


        • #5
          I was wondering if doctors should be obligated to offer all treatment options...even a referral if it's not necessarily indicated.

          This settlement says they should....Can you imagine the burn specialist seeing this guy??? He'd be annoyed with the first doc for 'dumping' a patient on him that wasn't justified. I mean I guess I don't know what the burnt toes/foot looked like....but still I guess the prosecution showed that in the subsequent visits the doc missed the worsening condition?

          Vet med/human med take:
          Should I offer referral to a vet endocrinologist every time I diagnose a cat with diabetes? Even if the owners don't have any money? Cases like this one make me think I should, and document it and have them sign it in the chart. I wonder if I would start to offend owners....make them feel as if they aren't doing the best course of action and that I disagree with them....sometimes documenting a 'lesser treatment' option is justified, but sometimes seeing the specialist would be overkill.
          Mom of 3, Veterinarian

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Michele
            I wonder if I would start to offend owners....make them feel as if they aren't doing the best course of action and that I disagree with them
            In a pet situation, I bet this would happen. I know I would feel that way. I have a hard time defining what is "appropriate" to spend on pet treatment (hence the cat with the $1000 broken leg).

            As far as people-doctors being obligated to offer all treatment options, I don't think they are at this time. I listened to a discussion (on NPR - where is the "addict" emoticon?) talking about this very topic. I think some states are looking to regulate this type of "what do you have to offer / tell", and the discussion was about the can of worms this opens.

            Comment

            Working...
            X