GOOD!! It's just been announced that that Dem guy (someone I've never heard of...the mayor of Anchorage or something?) beat Ted Stevens for the Senate seat. I know that, for the math for Republicans in the Senate control issue, I should have been rooting for Stevens to pull it out because, once he was forced to resign, the Rep Governor would replace him with a Rep. But I was disgusted that Ted Stevens didn't withdraw from the race. Perhaps he couldn't have, since his felony convictions came down so close in time to the election (a lot of states have rules that won't allow your name to be removed within a certain period of time before the election). But he should have said that he should not have been campaigning and he should have dealt with the long count in QUIET dignity. He is a CONVICTED FELON, for crying out loud, who abused his office! It is a disgrace that he was genuinely fighting for his seat.
But that's just me. Some people say, "Well, he's still got appeals..." but I think that the office is bigger than the man, and he should have done Alaska the service of surrendering that seat when he could no longer serve it honorably.
Is anyone from Alaska? Any thoughts on this?
But that's just me. Some people say, "Well, he's still got appeals..." but I think that the office is bigger than the man, and he should have done Alaska the service of surrendering that seat when he could no longer serve it honorably.
Is anyone from Alaska? Any thoughts on this?
Comment