What I don't think the people making these regulations get is the workload is the workload. It is consistent. IF anything, it gets heavier in terms of larger patient volumes coming in to an institution as the baby boomers age. So, if you cut back on the intern hours, where does that work go? I can tell you, the hospitals are NOT keen to hire NPs or nurses to fill in the blanks. DH's program finally did and it took 4 years of lobbying to make it happen. So, when the intern isn't there, do they give that work to the residents above? What if they are over the limit, too - stretched to the capacity of the 80 hour work week? Fellows?? They are now regulated too. So, it ends up with the attendings. Who quit - and go private where they make more money, work less and don't have to teach or serve on committees.
The only solution to the workload is MORE residents. The solutions to training time is longer residencies. Both of these mean less money for the system because they will have to pay out more. I think economics are winning now over patient care. When they figure out how to relieve the economic pressure, they might consider adding more staff. Isn't it funny how that solution never comes up when they talk about overworked residents? More help? Nah.
The only solution to the workload is MORE residents. The solutions to training time is longer residencies. Both of these mean less money for the system because they will have to pay out more. I think economics are winning now over patient care. When they figure out how to relieve the economic pressure, they might consider adding more staff. Isn't it funny how that solution never comes up when they talk about overworked residents? More help? Nah.
Comment