I'm sure this isn't a giant shock to anyone, but I agree with Heidi, 100%.
Announcement
Collapse
Facebook Forum Migration
Our forums have migrated to Facebook. If you are already an iMSN forum member you will be grandfathered in.
To access the Call Room and Marriage Matters, head to: https://m.facebook.com/groups/400932...eferrer=search
You can find the health and fitness forums here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/133538...eferrer=search
Private parenting discussions are here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/382903...eferrer=search
We look forward to seeing you on Facebook!
To access the Call Room and Marriage Matters, head to: https://m.facebook.com/groups/400932...eferrer=search
You can find the health and fitness forums here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/133538...eferrer=search
Private parenting discussions are here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/382903...eferrer=search
We look forward to seeing you on Facebook!
See more
See less
The Supreme Court and Healthcare Mandates
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Vanquisher View PostHospitals aren't the only ones who eat the costs for those who aren't insured or who are underinsured. Docs do too, and in a BIG way.Julia - legislative process lover and general government nerd, married to a PICU & Medical Ethics attending, raising a toddler son and expecting a baby daughter Oct '16.
Comment
-
Originally posted by oceanchild View PostWhich is why it's certainly possible that getting everyone insured could improve physician compensation. Who knows if this particular plan will get there, though. I agree that the insurance companies will have a lot of influence (good OR bad) in how it plays out.Tara
Married 20 years to MD/PhD in year 3 of MFM fellowship. SAHM to five wonderful children (#6 due in August), a sweet GSD named Bella, a black lab named Toby, and 1 guinea pig.
Comment
-
Depends on the specialty. Primary/family care docs will likely do better financially and highly specialized docs will not do quite as well as they are currently. The uptick in preventative care coverage will catch and treat conditions at far earlier stages, which will negate the need for more costly and specialized interventions.
Comment
-
Originally posted by diggitydot View PostDepends on the specialty. Primary/family care docs will likely do better financially and highly specialized docs will not do quite as well as they are currently. The uptick in preventative care coverage will catch and treat conditions at far earlier stages, which will negate the need for more costly and specialized interventions.Tara
Married 20 years to MD/PhD in year 3 of MFM fellowship. SAHM to five wonderful children (#6 due in August), a sweet GSD named Bella, a black lab named Toby, and 1 guinea pig.
Comment
-
I'm not saying they should or shouldn't have pay changes. I'm just explaining how increasing preventative care access will exert pressure on physician pay differently depending on specialty.
It won't necessarily change reimbursement rates, only the sheer number of patients with cases rising to the need of specialist care. Catching conditions earlier lowers costs to the entire healthcare system (less overutilization of expensive emergency care, in particular), and gives patients better prognoses. Since millions more people will have insurance coverage, they'll be more likely to go to their primary doc for screenings.
Comment
-
GMW, I agreed with you before u deleted it!~Mom of 5, married to an ID doc
~A Rolling Stone Gathers No Moss
Comment
-
Preventative care will go to advanced practice nurses. DNP programs (clinical doctorate degree) are being phased-in in 2015. General practioners pay is not heading up but to nurses who are more affordable. It's a win-win. Preventative care, more readily available for less money.-Ladybug
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vanquisher View PostHospitals aren't the only ones who eat the costs for those who aren't insured or who are underinsured. Docs do too, and in a BIG way.
I think the whole mess is all the fault of insurance companies. They are horrible corporations that make money, and a lot of it, by denying necessary medical care left and right, forcing doctors to write off thousands of dollars and people to lose everything.
I hate them all.
I have a friend from college who has lost both of his parents to cancer in the past year. The insurance companies were going after the father, who was undergoing cancer treatment, to collect on the bills from cancer treatment/hospice care from his recently deceased wife. Now these winners are going after the parents' estate/the friend and his younger brother to collect on their parents' bills. Absolutely ridiculous.
I don't know as much about this topic as I should, and I'm going to try and pay more attention to it now that SCOTUS is discussing it.Event coordinator, wife and therapist to a peds attending
Comment
Comment