The Iowa Supreme Court ruled in favor of a man who fired an employee because he found her to be too attractive....
I'm sure there's another side to this debate (hence the reason I put this in the debate forum) but I just can't figure out how they came to this ruling. She didn't flirt with him, she didn't encourage him, and though he claimed her clothes were too tight she wasn't fired for breaking the dress code. She was fired because his wife felt she was a threat to their marriage.
Link to full story: http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/21/justic...html?hpt=hp_t1
Any thoughts about this? I'm just... confused
ETA: Here's the link to the actual ruling: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/im....pdf?hpt=hp_t1
I'm sure there's another side to this debate (hence the reason I put this in the debate forum) but I just can't figure out how they came to this ruling. She didn't flirt with him, she didn't encourage him, and though he claimed her clothes were too tight she wasn't fired for breaking the dress code. She was fired because his wife felt she was a threat to their marriage.
Link to full story: http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/21/justic...html?hpt=hp_t1
Any thoughts about this? I'm just... confused
ETA: Here's the link to the actual ruling: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/im....pdf?hpt=hp_t1
Comment