So something I've been thinking about a lot lately - when patient's ask who is doing their surgery at academic medical centers, the party line is for the resident/fellow to say "I will be assisting Dr. [attending] with the procedure". Now, clearly the attending is in a supervisory role and depending on the surgery may do almost all/most/some of the procedure. But in some cases, especially with simple things or "bread and butter" surgeries, residents are much less supervised or they do the majority of the case. Now in some cases, the residents may be even more familiar with these surgeries since they do them every day but in other cases, it's the first one they've ever done (obviously more closely supervised).
I don't think patients know this. Should they?
Setting aside that of course a doctor has to learn/practice the procedures and activities of a surgeon, is it ethical for patients to be unclear about the extent of participation that a training physician is taking in their care?
I don't think patients know this. Should they?
Setting aside that of course a doctor has to learn/practice the procedures and activities of a surgeon, is it ethical for patients to be unclear about the extent of participation that a training physician is taking in their care?
Comment