Against my better judgment, I just argued with a friend on FB after she posted a comment about vaccinations. Do you argue with people, or just let them be?
For reference, this was the comment (last I knew, they were vaccinating their children but on a delayed schedule - they also had their babies at home):
My response:
For reference, this was the comment (last I knew, they were vaccinating their children but on a delayed schedule - they also had their babies at home):
I don't think I've shared our vaccination decisions on FB and probably will not (soon anyway) because people on both sides of the fence get so ugly about it. We do a lot of research before we come to a decision about each one on the schedule. This study conducted by the FDA offers some food for thought when you hear the argument that those who do not get their child vaccinated are guilty of spreading disease. Spoiler alert: the vaccinated subjects in this study were found to contract the infection and transmit the disease. Un-vaccinated children, adults (immunity does not last forever for most diseases and sometimes not at all depending on personal biological factors), and vaccinated children all spread disease. This is not an argument for or against vaccination, but please take this info into account before jumping on the "anti-vaxxers are going to kill my child" train.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3896208/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3896208/
There's a commentary in the same issue that refutes a lot of points from the article. Also, this is a single study about one vaccine in baboons, so I'd be careful to make decisions about all vaccines for humans based on it. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3932918/
Comment