It seems that Wal-Mart is public enemy number one these days. Is that deserved? Or is Wal-Mart simply a successful business that provides a desired service to customers and reasonable employment? Wal-Mart has also received bad press for the way it treats its suppliers.
So, what do you think?
Are the employment practices abysmal? Wal-Mart doesn't pay terribly well and is currently being sued for making employees work "off the clock" and not paying overtime as it should have. According to Economist, Wal-Mart faces an employee turnover rate of 44%, and as a result "has to hire an astonishing 600,000 people every year simply to stay at its current size." Sounds like people don't like working there for long but that's still less than the industry average. Is this simply supply and demand at work in the labor sector? Should employment at Wal-Mart be viewed as a long-term career or a stepping stone for future employment? Is the value of an entry-level employee really worth more than $8?
Has Wal-Mart forced other retailers to be more competitive -- benefiting all consumers, even those who do not shop at Wal-Mart? A great company that has probably one of the most recognizable brand names?
Some may say these practices are just a part of doing business but not all retailers operate this way. Costco pays its employees upwards of $10/hr and is a very successful company (their starting salary is higher than the average Wal-Mart employee salary). Target offers its employees better wages and benefits too and doesn't seem to be hurting for that.
So, what do you think?
Are the employment practices abysmal? Wal-Mart doesn't pay terribly well and is currently being sued for making employees work "off the clock" and not paying overtime as it should have. According to Economist, Wal-Mart faces an employee turnover rate of 44%, and as a result "has to hire an astonishing 600,000 people every year simply to stay at its current size." Sounds like people don't like working there for long but that's still less than the industry average. Is this simply supply and demand at work in the labor sector? Should employment at Wal-Mart be viewed as a long-term career or a stepping stone for future employment? Is the value of an entry-level employee really worth more than $8?
Has Wal-Mart forced other retailers to be more competitive -- benefiting all consumers, even those who do not shop at Wal-Mart? A great company that has probably one of the most recognizable brand names?
Some may say these practices are just a part of doing business but not all retailers operate this way. Costco pays its employees upwards of $10/hr and is a very successful company (their starting salary is higher than the average Wal-Mart employee salary). Target offers its employees better wages and benefits too and doesn't seem to be hurting for that.
Comment