Why oh why can't customer service be what it should be w/o having to get b!tchy and demanding?
We bought a new camera on 8/16 (Canon Power Shot A630), and already the lens cover is not closing on it's own. The camera works fine, the lens retracts, but the actual lens does not get covered. Not good for me who likes to carry it in my purse.
I called the store where we bought it & was told that the return period is 14 days so I had to take it up with Canon. We'd bought the super-duper-even-if-you-drop-it warranty, but that doesn't kick in until after Canon's warranty expires. So I called Canon, and was informed I needed to pack it up while standing on my head and singing the Star Spangled Banner (read: very specific packing requirements so that they'd be able to nullify the warranty if I skipped a step), and that I'd be w/o my camera for 7 to 10 business days after they receive it.
Why should I be camera-less b/c I got an inferior product? Why should I have to buy bubble wrap, ship & insure it, etc.? I should be able to take it to the store where I purchased it, get a new one, and Canon should credit the retailer for the POS camera.
So I called the store back, asked to speak to a customer service manager (I'd already talked to a CS rep who'd told me there was nothing to be done), and politely, but directly explained that this is BS. It's ridiculous that I'd be better off if I'd gotten a year's use out of the camera and then had this happen. It's ridiculous that I should be w/o the camera I purchased for probably 3 weeks. Should I ship mine off, go to the store, buy a new one, and then return it when I get mine back?? She called Canon & got a return authorization and now I get to return it.
I'm pleased with the outcome, but ticked that I had to deal w/all of that aggravation b/c of foolish "policies". Perhaps they need to work out a better return authorization with Canon -- but I shouldn't be yanked around like this.
We bought a new camera on 8/16 (Canon Power Shot A630), and already the lens cover is not closing on it's own. The camera works fine, the lens retracts, but the actual lens does not get covered. Not good for me who likes to carry it in my purse.
I called the store where we bought it & was told that the return period is 14 days so I had to take it up with Canon. We'd bought the super-duper-even-if-you-drop-it warranty, but that doesn't kick in until after Canon's warranty expires. So I called Canon, and was informed I needed to pack it up while standing on my head and singing the Star Spangled Banner (read: very specific packing requirements so that they'd be able to nullify the warranty if I skipped a step), and that I'd be w/o my camera for 7 to 10 business days after they receive it.
Why should I be camera-less b/c I got an inferior product? Why should I have to buy bubble wrap, ship & insure it, etc.? I should be able to take it to the store where I purchased it, get a new one, and Canon should credit the retailer for the POS camera.
So I called the store back, asked to speak to a customer service manager (I'd already talked to a CS rep who'd told me there was nothing to be done), and politely, but directly explained that this is BS. It's ridiculous that I'd be better off if I'd gotten a year's use out of the camera and then had this happen. It's ridiculous that I should be w/o the camera I purchased for probably 3 weeks. Should I ship mine off, go to the store, buy a new one, and then return it when I get mine back?? She called Canon & got a return authorization and now I get to return it.
I'm pleased with the outcome, but ticked that I had to deal w/all of that aggravation b/c of foolish "policies". Perhaps they need to work out a better return authorization with Canon -- but I shouldn't be yanked around like this.
Comment