1. Would you have them go to med school? If not, what would you choose for them instead?
Yes to med school. Easy decision on that one still.
2. If you were choosing a specialty for them, would you choose the same one? Why or why not?
Unghpf. As of today I give a very cautious yes. There were definitely times during the job search and again during the making-partner process that I would have said no. The tight job market and instability of it still kill me. He really enjoys the actual practice of pathology. A lot. But every grownup knows you can't live on love. If everything stayed like it is today I'd choose pathology again, but I reserve the right to change my answer in the future.
3. Regardless of your answer to #2, pick something else. What is it? Why?
I don't know, some other ROAD specialty? I confess there's a lot I don't know about what other kinds of doctors actually do all day.
4. Is there anything else in the process you would have changed in hindsight, e.g., geography, practice type, fellowship, rank list, school choice, etc.?
The PhD would be first up on the chopping block, for sure. Or at least first up for consideration. (Time travel paradox, yadda yadda yadda.)
I have asked myself MANY times what different choices we might have made during training to get a more perfect outcome. Being more of a prestige whore on the rank list (and thereby lying hardcore about wanting to do academics), doing fellowship at Michigan instead of Minnesota, and doing a second fellowship in molecular all lead that "what if" list. Basically everything I can think of, though, we know someone IRL who did that and still had similar struggles and outcomes to ours, though. And I think I'm happier with our outcome than I'm making it sound here. There's quite a lot of stuff I wouldn't want to change or jeopardize.
Yes to med school. Easy decision on that one still.
2. If you were choosing a specialty for them, would you choose the same one? Why or why not?
Unghpf. As of today I give a very cautious yes. There were definitely times during the job search and again during the making-partner process that I would have said no. The tight job market and instability of it still kill me. He really enjoys the actual practice of pathology. A lot. But every grownup knows you can't live on love. If everything stayed like it is today I'd choose pathology again, but I reserve the right to change my answer in the future.
3. Regardless of your answer to #2, pick something else. What is it? Why?
I don't know, some other ROAD specialty? I confess there's a lot I don't know about what other kinds of doctors actually do all day.
4. Is there anything else in the process you would have changed in hindsight, e.g., geography, practice type, fellowship, rank list, school choice, etc.?
The PhD would be first up on the chopping block, for sure. Or at least first up for consideration. (Time travel paradox, yadda yadda yadda.)
I have asked myself MANY times what different choices we might have made during training to get a more perfect outcome. Being more of a prestige whore on the rank list (and thereby lying hardcore about wanting to do academics), doing fellowship at Michigan instead of Minnesota, and doing a second fellowship in molecular all lead that "what if" list. Basically everything I can think of, though, we know someone IRL who did that and still had similar struggles and outcomes to ours, though. And I think I'm happier with our outcome than I'm making it sound here. There's quite a lot of stuff I wouldn't want to change or jeopardize.
Comment