DH and I have started looking at houses in our next location, and we're really torn between houses that are in more traditional neighborhoods vs. houses on larger pieces of land (2 or 3 acres). It feels like there's such a huge difference in terms of lifestyle, but both options seem intriguing.
Some of the things I'm considering: Prices are similar, although the larger properties would require more time/money for upkeep. The neighborhood houses are closer to shopping/hospitals (5 minutes vs. 15), but the "country" houses are in the better school district, so a shorter drive to school each day. We enjoy going on family walks, and I can't imagine walking around an without sidewalks. We don't have animals, besides a small dog, but I would love to have my own gardens some day. As you can see, I'm really torn.
For those of you who grew up in the suburbs or country, or live there now, which do you prefer?? Will I miss sidewalks if we move to the country? Is not having close neighbors enough of a benefit to outweigh everything else?
Some of the things I'm considering: Prices are similar, although the larger properties would require more time/money for upkeep. The neighborhood houses are closer to shopping/hospitals (5 minutes vs. 15), but the "country" houses are in the better school district, so a shorter drive to school each day. We enjoy going on family walks, and I can't imagine walking around an without sidewalks. We don't have animals, besides a small dog, but I would love to have my own gardens some day. As you can see, I'm really torn.
For those of you who grew up in the suburbs or country, or live there now, which do you prefer?? Will I miss sidewalks if we move to the country? Is not having close neighbors enough of a benefit to outweigh everything else?
Comment