Originally posted by Pollyanna
View Post
And I totally don't get the math thing. I know that those who create the educational policy of this country have decided that we must keep up with the math superpowers in Asia. That means that 4th graders should know sine, cosine and tangent and all of those other crazy math things that I've long since forgotten about. I struggled in math and science in HS. I was on the Honors track from 7th grade through 10th (pre-algebra, algebra I, geometry, algebra II). In 9th grade geometry after some poor grades, my parents kind of forced me to sit at the front of the room and ask questions (the teacher agreed to this). At first, I didn't like it, but eventually those behaviors became part of how I tackled the math problem. I still struggled in algebra II sophomore year, (B-C grades) so I stepped down to the College track in junior year for pre-calc. I did much better and it boosted my confidence a little bit, enough that senior year I jumped back into the Honors track and took calc I (the people on the super-Honors track were taking AP Calc). I got really luck when it was time to go off to college - placement testing showed that I belonged in the school's calc I classes, which meant I had met 90% of the college's math requirements for graduation. Yay! The other 10% came from taking 1 math class, which I got out of the way first semester and it was called Math for Liberal Arts or something like that. I haven't had a whiff of math in 10 years!! Science is a whole other ball of wax - I also started out in the Honors track. I did well in earth sciences, but struggled in Physics sophomore year. It was terrible. I got C's that should have been D's and the final semester was really a F that my hysterical sobbing brought up to a D. After that year, I stepped down to the College track and took Chemistry. I did a lot better (A-B grades) and I actually enjoyed it. Thankfully there was no science my senior year and I only had to take 1 science course in college, which Human Sexuality satisfied.
My long story is trying to make the point that I struggled in math and science, but somehow made it work for me. I got into colleges and universities and did quite well. I always succeeded in English, history, electives, Latin (well sort of), etc. I was interested in college because I wanted to get the hell away from my backwater town, I wanted to meet people and do things that didn't revolve around parties and small-town gossip. I loved (and still do) learning - I feel like I can't learn enough about the world around me. Even though I know Wikipedia isn't really a true reference source, I could sit and read through it for hours on end. I'm by no means an expert on any of the subjects I read up about, but I love learning a new little tidbit about the world and its history. What made me interested in college (besides getting far away from white-trash-land) was looking at brochures, visiting schools (I remember visiting my friend's sister at Ithaca when I was a sophomore, it was really cool) and talking to friends about the whole college thing. I also went to 2 programs at nearby college campuses - one was through a community service organization I belonged to and the other was yearbook camp, lol. Even though it was just 2-3 days away from home, experiencing dorms, dining halls and being away from home made me really excited about college.
HS guidance counselors should have access to career counseling materials, such as career inventories or surveys, that can help HS students make some sense out of how their interests can apply to college majors/jobs/careers. I feel like this is sometimes an overlooked portion of counseling HS students, as a lot of time is spent dealing with schedules, grades, college prep, and other personal problems. Don't get me wrong, it isn't all on the counselor to propel the student to something meaningful after graduation, but giving access to the career counseling resources available would be a HUGE help.
I highly recommend taking a version of a career inventory which uses Holland's theory. The theory basically assumes that there are different types of people and environments, and that an interaction between the two determines a person's behavior and the type of occupation that they are attracted to. There are a lot of tests out there that apply Holland's theory; I like one of them in particular called Self-Directed Search (SDS). I know it comes in booklet form (of course I can't find mine right now), but you can take the test online for $4.95 through the SDS website: http://www.self-directed-search.com/. You take the test and when you are finished, payment will be required before you see the results. It generates a really detailed report, with links to O*Net, which provide detailed descriptions of the occupations that match up with the participant's interests/codes.
Comment