Announcement

Collapse

Facebook Forum Migration

Our forums have migrated to Facebook. If you are already an iMSN forum member you will be grandfathered in.

To access the Call Room and Marriage Matters, head to: https://m.facebook.com/groups/400932...eferrer=search

You can find the health and fitness forums here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/133538...eferrer=search

Private parenting discussions are here: https://m.facebook.com/groups/382903...eferrer=search

We look forward to seeing you on Facebook!
See more
See less

Full disclosure vs. religious ojections?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by DCJenn
    I do have a problem with pharmacists refusing to dispense medications. That's their job. and there may be compelling reasons why a person is taking the medications as ordered.

    The morning after pill is a primary example. What if the female in question was raped. What if she's physically unable to bear children but able to get pregnant? What if she is taking medication like accutane and had a birth control malfunction?

    there are so many reasons why a person might take something that I don't think it's the pharmacists job to decide what is right or wrong. or if they feel that strongly about it- then they need to go work somewhere that wouldn't prescribe such things in the first place- like the local church affiliated hospital pharmacy.


    Jenn
    That's how I feel. Especially b/c is smaller towns, 1 pharmacist might be all there is! What if their religion prohibits birth control? What if their religion prohibits things made w/animal byproducts? I don't feel like in "dispensing" they are either performing the "act" (as a GYN would do in an abortion), or "condoning" b/c the drug is not being given of THEIR authority, but the physician (or NP's) authority.

    Comment

    Working...
    X