So, after the CDC assured us last week that there was little chance of Ebola coming to the US, they've decided to transport 2 US citizens with Ebola back to the US to be treated.
http://health.usnews.com/health-news...-for-treatment
I'm disturbed by this decision, because one of the biggest challenges aid and health workers have had in the heart of the outbreak is a deep distrust of the medical community. And the CDC has been trumpeting the "trust us, we're doing everything that is possible" until US citizens get sick, then they get medically evacuated? What happens when other aid workers get sick? Are we setting a precedent here? The CDC has stated that any hospital with an ICU can easily set up a isolation for Ebola. Um, really?
Furthermore, anyone else concerned with the CDC's record of containing deadly diseases in the past few months?
http://health.usnews.com/health-news...-for-treatment
I'm disturbed by this decision, because one of the biggest challenges aid and health workers have had in the heart of the outbreak is a deep distrust of the medical community. And the CDC has been trumpeting the "trust us, we're doing everything that is possible" until US citizens get sick, then they get medically evacuated? What happens when other aid workers get sick? Are we setting a precedent here? The CDC has stated that any hospital with an ICU can easily set up a isolation for Ebola. Um, really?
Furthermore, anyone else concerned with the CDC's record of containing deadly diseases in the past few months?
Comment