Since this is formerly the debate thread, why not debate a bit?
(But let's try not to dogpile!) I believe that we are making ourselves far safer by admitting more refugees. By leaving them in camps, we are increasing the likelihood of your men being recruited into terrorist organizations, versus the smaller chance exposure to them while attending public schools in the United States. We are also decreasing the chances of a massive outbreak of diseases by getting people out of the camps. What are some alternatives to resettling the refugees besides admitting them into other nations? Do you support more military action in Syria to help them regain their land? Or should we let them in but make changes to our current screening system? If the latter, what changes do you propose?
For reference, here's a good description of the current screening system: http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/16/politi...nts-explainer/

For reference, here's a good description of the current screening system: http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/16/politi...nts-explainer/
Comment