Ok, I'm wading in cautiously here because I may have a differing opinion and I don't really want to get killed.
I completely agree 13 is way too young to be sexually active and that the girl should be counseled about what she's doing. i.e. is she being coerced, etc. But I knew several girls who had sex at 13 with boyfriends 1-2 years older who went on to have completely normal sexual histories. One of my best friends lost her virginity at 13 and when she told me when I was 13, I hadn't even been KISSED. Nonetheless, I'm not sure it's coercion when it's a 14 year old boy and a 13 year old girl. Too young, yes, but coercion no.
These friends that I mention above rode bikes or got rides from older friends to planned parenthood. And the planned parenthood provided services regardless of age. I drove two younger girls on my soccer team to get the morning after pill when I was 17 (and still not sexually active, thank you!) and they were 15.
One question: Could you recommend that the child ask her pediatrician at their next visit? A child of 13 is old enough to ask to see the doctor alone or could call in advance to ask to see the doctor alone. While the 13 year old couldn't get an Rx without the parent probably, at least the pediatrician can help broach it with the parents and potentially suggest it for "cramps" or something if he/she deems the child needs the contraception. DF watched a 13 year old deliver a baby when he shadowed at Metro.
In the case that the pediatrician is not an option, I would consider my relationship with the child and her parents. Are the parents loving, caring, responsible people who will react in a non-abusive manner to this situation? What is the child's maturity level? If the child is not being coerced though and is determined to do this, she WILL do it. A friend will drive her, etc. From a legal perspective, you may not be able to drive her but you could provide her with alternatives: condoms, a bus route to get her there, taking her for counseling only. I'm not sure of the exact solution in this situation but I don't think my categorical response would be: No.
Ok, I know a lot of you disagree. Be kind!
I completely agree 13 is way too young to be sexually active and that the girl should be counseled about what she's doing. i.e. is she being coerced, etc. But I knew several girls who had sex at 13 with boyfriends 1-2 years older who went on to have completely normal sexual histories. One of my best friends lost her virginity at 13 and when she told me when I was 13, I hadn't even been KISSED. Nonetheless, I'm not sure it's coercion when it's a 14 year old boy and a 13 year old girl. Too young, yes, but coercion no.
These friends that I mention above rode bikes or got rides from older friends to planned parenthood. And the planned parenthood provided services regardless of age. I drove two younger girls on my soccer team to get the morning after pill when I was 17 (and still not sexually active, thank you!) and they were 15.
One question: Could you recommend that the child ask her pediatrician at their next visit? A child of 13 is old enough to ask to see the doctor alone or could call in advance to ask to see the doctor alone. While the 13 year old couldn't get an Rx without the parent probably, at least the pediatrician can help broach it with the parents and potentially suggest it for "cramps" or something if he/she deems the child needs the contraception. DF watched a 13 year old deliver a baby when he shadowed at Metro.
In the case that the pediatrician is not an option, I would consider my relationship with the child and her parents. Are the parents loving, caring, responsible people who will react in a non-abusive manner to this situation? What is the child's maturity level? If the child is not being coerced though and is determined to do this, she WILL do it. A friend will drive her, etc. From a legal perspective, you may not be able to drive her but you could provide her with alternatives: condoms, a bus route to get her there, taking her for counseling only. I'm not sure of the exact solution in this situation but I don't think my categorical response would be: No.
Ok, I know a lot of you disagree. Be kind!
Comment