Originally posted by jesher
I have had bags before, and I don't care if they are more cost effective in the long run (buying new filters, etc.), I like to see that I am getting something up. I just like the bagless better. They claim that the dirt isn't sealed. Well, if a bagged vacuum really picked up as much as my bagless, I would have to change the bag every week! That's a lot of bags! I have only bought one new filter for my vacuum, and I didn't really need to. I just cleaned the old one, and it worked fine.
Maybe we should move this to the debate forum !
Before my current vaccum, I had a Eureka Boss. It was horrible. It got up the stuff you could see, but I only changed the bag in that once a year. Imagine the filth in my carpet. Ah well, it was an apartment. But still, EWWWW.
I would like to do my own testing. You think a vacuum store would let me take all the models home and test them?
K- So I can't trust the Consumer Reports rankings...
Now what?
Comment